
Why many MSMEs fail to expand — and how courage, strategy, and professional leadership can unlock true growth.

Published September 23, 2025
The Founder's Scale Paradox is a sibling to the Pay Paradox. It explains why MSMEs, despite having a successful local or niche business model, shrink from the challenge of mass market expansion. This isn't just a business decision; it's a deep-seated fear rooted in the same mindset of scarcity that governs their payroll. The founder, who painstakingly built their company from the ground up, sees a small, profitable business as a secure kingdom. Expanding to a mass market feels like abandoning that kingdom for a risky, unknown territory. They fear the exposure, the financial commitment, and the potential for a catastrophic failure on a grand scale. This fear prevents them from attracting the kind of talent that thrives on ambition and innovation - the very people needed to lead a successful expansion. As a result, the company remains a well-kept secret, never achieving the brand recognition or Top-of-Mind Awareness (TOMA) needed to compete with the big players.
Once a ubiquitous part of India's urban landscape, Cafe Coffee Day (CCD) is a powerful example of a company that, despite achieving massive scale, ultimately crumbled under the weight of its own founder’s paradox.
The Dream: In the late 1990s, V.G. Siddhartha envisioned a space where young Indians could meet, relax, and enjoy a cup of coffee. He wasn't just selling coffee; he was selling an experience, a "third place" between home and work. He expanded at a blistering pace, opening thousands of outlets across India. CCD became a household name and a symbol of India's burgeoning cafe culture. The company seemed to be the antithesis of the MSME paradox, a true success story of mass market expansion.
The Hidden Flaw: While the company grew in size, its internal systems and financial management didn't keep up. The paradox wasn't in their willingness to scale, but in the paradoxical reliance on debt and a lack of professional financial oversight. Siddhartha, driven by a personal vision, kept acquiring land and pouring money into ventures beyond the core business. He was the sole captain, the only decision-maker, and refused to delegate financial control to professional managers. The fear of losing personal control and the desire for continued rapid expansion led him to borrow heavily, using his personal assets as collateral.
The Aftermath: When market conditions tightened and debt collectors came calling, the house of cards collapsed. The company’s massive scale, once its greatest asset, became its biggest liability. Without a robust, professionally-managed financial structure, the stress became unbearable. Siddhartha's tragic death in 2019 was a stark reminder that scale without sound management and a willingness to cede personal control is a recipe for disaster. The CCD story isn't just about debt; it's about a founder who couldn't transition from a personal, hands-on model to a professional, corporate one. They built an empire, but failed to build a team capable of managing it. This failure to delegate authority and trust professionals, a form of the "founder's control paradox," led to their tragic downfall.
The story of Royal Enfield's resurgence is a masterclass in overcoming the Founder's Scale Paradox, demonstrating how a heritage brand, long dormant, was brought back to life through courageous, strategic leadership.
The Legacy: For decades, Royal Enfield was a niche, almost-extinct motorcycle brand. Its bikes, known for their rugged, old-school charm, were loved by a small group of loyalists but were no match for the modern, fuel-efficient bikes dominating the market. The company was profitable but had no ambition for mass market domination. It was a classic MSME, content in its cozy corner of the market.
The Catalyst: The shift began when Siddhartha Lal, the CEO of Eicher Motors (which owned Royal Enfield), took a daring step. He had a vision to transform Royal Enfield from a nostalgic relic into a global icon. This wasn't just about making better bikes; it was about shifting the entire brand's identity. He invested heavily in a new global design and technology center, something an MSME would never dream of. He didn't just tweak the existing models; he reimagined them for a global audience, improving reliability, performance, and design.
The Courageous Leap: Lal's biggest leap was taking a financial and reputational risk. He understood that to compete with international brands, they couldn't just rely on their legacy. They had to build a product that was world-class. This required significant investment in research and development, a leap of faith that many MSME owners would consider too risky. But Lal wasn't afraid to bet big. He also hired top talent from the global motorcycle industry, bringing in expertise that the company previously lacked. He was not just willing to pay them well; he gave them the autonomy to innovate and transform the brand.
The Outcome: The result was a complete renaissance. Royal Enfield launched a new line of motorcycles, like the Himalayan and the 650 Twins, which were critically acclaimed and sold worldwide. They didn't just dominate the Indian market; they entered new territories in Europe, the US, and Southeast Asia. Royal Enfield became a symbol of a new kind of "cool," appealing to a younger generation that valued both heritage and modern performance. This success was a direct result of Lal's courage to break the paradox. He didn’t settle for a small, profitable niche; he invested in talent and innovation, and in doing so, created a global brand that continues to grow exponentially.
These quotes are a reminder that stagnation is a far greater risk than a calculated leap of faith. The fear of failure is a powerful force, but it is also the biggest barrier to success.
The Founder's Scale Paradox isn't just about a fear of a bigger market; it's about a fear of a bigger self. It's the moment when a founder must shed their identity as the one-person-army and embrace the role of a leader who empowers others.
The CCD story is a painful reminder that even massive scale can't compensate for a lack of professional management and a founder's unwillingness to let go. Conversely, Royal Enfield's rebirth proves that a courageous leap - backed by strategic investment and a trust in new talent - can transform a brand from a mere footnote into a global force. The question for every MSME founder today is not "Can I afford to expand?" but rather, "Can I afford not to?" The world is moving fast, and the companies that stay in their comfort zones will soon find that their cozy kingdoms have become irrelevant islands in a global ocean. The biggest risk is not in scaling, but in staying small. The biggest investment is not in a new machine, but in the people who will lead you into the future.